Grammarly sued for alleged unauthorized use of writers' identities in AI-powered editing feature
Here's what it means for you.
If your professional reputation or creative work is online, AI tools may use your identity in ways you never agreed to—and legal risks for platforms are rising.
What happened
On March 11, 2026, a class action lawsuit accused Grammarly of using the names and likenesses of hundreds of experts—including journalists and authors—in its AI-powered “Expert Review” feature without their consent.
The Context
- AI impersonation is under legal fire: The suit alleges Grammarly’s $12/month add-on simulated editing advice from real figures like Stephen King and Neil deGrasse Tyson, sparking backlash and fast removal.
- Consent is the new frontier: The feature used public data to mimic experts without their approval, reflecting a broader trend of lawsuits over AI-generated content and identity rights.
- Corporate response is rapid but defensive: Grammarly’s parent, Superhuman, disabled the tool within hours and promised a consent-based redesign, while calling the claims “without merit.”
The Number
— The minimum damages sought for alleged misappropriation, signaling real financial stakes for companies using AI to simulate human expertise.
Takeaway
Expect stricter controls and new legal standards for how AI platforms use real people’s identities—especially if your name or work carries weight online.
This article was generated by AI from 7 verified sources and reviewed by A47 editorial systems.
News and features on AI from The Guardian.
"Progressive-leaning international outlet with critical AI coverage."
— A47 Editor
Grammarly removes AI Expert Review feature mimicking writers after backlash
Grammarly has disabled its AI-powered 'Expert Review' feature, which generated editing suggestions mimicking the styles of well-known writers and academics, after facing public backlash and a class action lawsuit over the use of real names without co...
Startup news with frequent AI coverage.
"Covers launches, funding, and product updates in AI."
— A47 Editor
A writer is suing Grammarly for turning her and other authors into ‘AI editors’ without consent
Journalist Julia Angwin has filed a class action lawsuit against Grammarly, alleging the company violated her privacy and publicity rights by using her and other authors' identities in its AI-powered 'Expert Review' feature without consent.
Curated tech headlines including AI stories.
"Influential aggregator surfacing the day’s top tech/AI links."
— A47 Editor
Superhuman faces a proposed class action lawsuit from Julia Angwin, founder of The Markup, alleging Grammarly's Expert Review tool involved "misappropriation" (Miles Klee/Wired)
Superhuman is facing a proposed class action lawsuit from Julia Angwin, founder of The Markup, alleging that Grammarly's now-disabled 'Expert Review' tool misappropriated the identities of established authors and academics by presenting AI-generated ...
Consumer tech and culture with frequent AI coverage.
"Influential tech outlet covering AI products and policy."
— A47 Editor
One of Grammarly’s ‘experts’ is suing the company over its identity-stealing AI feature
Grammarly is facing a lawsuit from journalist Julia Angwin, who alleges the company used her identity without permission in its "Expert Review" AI feature, as reported by The Verge and Wired.
Tech news, reviews, and analysis of consumer electronics, science, art, and culture.
"The Verge is a technology-focused media outlet known for in-depth reporting, product reviews, and coverage of the intersection between technology and culture."
— A47 Editor
One of Grammarly’s ‘experts’ is suing the company over its identity-stealing AI feature
Grammarly is facing a lawsuit from journalist Julia Angwin, who alleges the company used her identity without permission in its "Expert Review" AI feature, as reported by The Verge and Wired.
Covers consumer technology, electronics, gadgets, and product reviews.
"Engadget is a trusted source for gadget reviews and consumer tech news, known for its hands-on analysis and industry coverage."
— A47 Editor
Grammarly has disabled its tool offering generative-AI feedback credited to real writers
Grammarly has disabled its "Expert Review" AI feature, which generated feedback attributed to well-known writers and academics, after concerns emerged about using real individuals' identities without consent.
Consumer technology news with AI coverage.
"Gadget and tech site reporting on AI in products."
— A47 Editor
Grammarly has disabled its tool offering generative-AI feedback credited to real writers
Grammarly has disabled its "Expert Review" AI feature, which generated feedback attributed to well-known writers and academics, after concerns emerged about using real individuals' identities without consent.
Latest WIRED coverage of AI.
"WIRED covers AI at the intersection of tech, culture, and policy."
— A47 Editor
Grammarly Is Facing a Class Action Lawsuit Over Its AI ‘Expert Review’ Feature
Grammarly is facing a class action lawsuit after its AI-powered 'Expert Review' feature presented editing suggestions as if they came from real authors and academics without their consent, leading the company to shut down the feature.
Emerging technologies, digital transformation, IT, and cultural impact of tech.
"WIRED covers the intersection of technology, culture, and politics with a progressive, forward-looking editorial stance."
— A47 Editor
Grammarly Is Facing a Class Action Lawsuit Over Its AI ‘Expert Review’ Feature
Grammarly is facing a class action lawsuit after its AI-powered 'Expert Review' feature presented editing suggestions as if they came from real authors and academics without their consent, leading the company to shut down the feature.
Curated tech headlines including AI stories.
"Influential aggregator surfacing the day’s top tech/AI links."
— A47 Editor
Superhuman says it has disabled Grammarly's Expert Review feature, which gave editing suggestions "inspired by" real writers without permission, after backlash (Stevie Bonifield/The Verge)
Superhuman has disabled Grammarly's Expert Review feature, which provided editing suggestions "inspired by" real writers without their permission, following significant public backlash and criticism.